
Für eine bessere Ansicht der Tabellen bitte im Querformat drucken
FischView
Monthly Update – October 2025
by Beat Thoma
Summary: Power struggle between the Fed and Treasury
- The global liquidity cycle is approaching its end but remains in an expansionary phase for now, continuing to buoy equity and credit markets.
- Ample liquidity, coupled with high levels of government spending, is fuelling global economic growth — and with it, inflation. This in turn exerts upward pressure on long-term interest rates.
- In this environment, we remain slightly overweight in terms of risk exposure and neutral to slightly short in duration.
Overall economic situation
Despite a superficial cooling in the US labour market, there are currently no signs of recession. The GDPNow estimate for the third quarter stands at 3.8%, and the informative Weekly Economic Indicator (WEI) continues to signal stable week-on-week growth. Retail sales and travel activity remain near historical highs. US government spending is surging, and liquidity is rising. Against this backdrop, the Fed’s recent rate cut was unnecessary. Europe, too, is seeing a modest acceleration in growth.
Recent developments: Financial markets ignoring risks
- The global liquidity cycle is now well advanced and nearing its peak. However, liquidity continues to expand — albeit at a slowing pace — providing a tailwind for equity and credit markets.
- As a result, global growth remains supported, though it is driven almost entirely by the aforementioned liquidity expansion and elevated fiscal spending, rendering it unsustainable.
- Meanwhile, a power struggle between the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve is intensifying. The Treasury is increasingly assuming functions traditionally performed by the Fed — including yield curve management through T-bill issuance and purchases of long-dated Treasuries. This interference is unprecedented in modern history and risks undermining confidence in institutional independence.
- For now, however, markets are largely dismissing these risks. The US dollar has yet to weaken meaningfully, and long-term yields have not spiked.
Overview & outlook: No sell signals yet
- The ongoing tug-of-war between the US Treasury and the Fed remains unresolved and continues to unsettle markets. There is a growing risk that investors lose confidence in the Fed’s ability to control interest rates and inflation. In this context, the Fed is actively draining liquidity through the continuation of its Quantitative Tightening (QT) programme and related measures, in an effort to offset the expansionary impact of its recent rate cut and the Treasury’s liquidity-boosting T-bill issuance.
- The Fed’s liquidity withdrawal directly affects equity and money markets, while the new Treasury-generated liquidity — via T-bill issuance and higher government borrowing — primarily stimulates the real economy. Consequently, the coming months are likely to bring stress in equity and money markets, but continued support for US growth.
- Recent statements by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and newly appointed Fed Governor Steven Miran — both advocating a continuation of QT — are noteworthy. This stance is not inconsistent with the Fed’s, as both are more concerned with sustaining economic growth than supporting equity markets or fuelling inflationary liquidity. However, stronger growth would tend to push long-term rates and inflation higher — a politically undesirable outcome, particularly for President Trump. Overall, this results in somewhat contradictory signals for stock markets.
- Importantly, global liquidity is still rising, though momentum is fading, and the Fed continues to reduce liquidity (and hence bank reserves) in the US. The situation would only become critical for global markets if US bank reserves — currently at USD 2.96 trillion — were to fall below USD 2.8 trillion. Such a decline would likely trigger a sharp widening of spreads between money-market rates (SOFR) and the Fed funds rate — a strong global warning signal for risk assets.
Chart: Global liquidity supports markets and the economy – the US as an example

Positioning: Tailwinds for corporate bonds
- Given the ongoing power struggle between the Fed and the US Treasury, monetary policy remains highly uncertain, raising the risk of a loss of control over long-term interest rates and inflation. Yet for now, the Treasury’s liquidity creation via T-bill issuance more than offsets the Fed’s restrictive stance, implying continued support for the economy, higher inflation, and upward pressure on long-term yields.
- That said, several measures are still in place to dampen long-end yields, so the pressure remains contained. We therefore maintain a neutral to slightly short duration stance. The same applies in Europe, where government bond yields are also rising, albeit amid weaker growth. French OAT yields warrant close monitoring, as they are climbing somewhat faster due to special factors — notably the widening fiscal deficit.
- Corporate bonds — particularly high yield and emerging market issues — continue to benefit from solid global growth and rising market liquidity. However, valuations are now rich and credit spreads tight. Rising rates and substantial refinancing requirements (the so-called debt maturity wall) could create headwinds in the months ahead. Accordingly, we remain neutrally positioned.
- Potential reasons to reduce exposure would include a sharp fall in the US dollar, widening SOFR-Fed funds spreads, rising long-term yields in the US, Germany, France, and Japan, or renewed inflationary pressures. For now, these are cautionary signals rather than outright sell indicators.
Summary of FischView model outputs
USA | Europe | Japan | Asia ex-Japan | LatAm | CEEMA | Legend | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return drivers | |||||||||
Equities |
|
||||||||
Government Bonds |
|
||||||||
Credit Inv. Grade (Spreads) |
|
||||||||
Credit High Yield (Spreads) |
|
||||||||
Total return | |||||||||
Convertibles |
|
||||||||
Credit Inv. Grade | |||||||||
Credit High Yield | |||||||||
Commodities | Energy: | Prec. Met: | Indu. Met: |
Notes regarding the tables
The table summarises the model results for the total return of convertible bonds and credit investment grade and high yield, which are a function of the listed return drivers. Changes from prior month are indicated with ↓ or ↑. i.e. "O ↓" means that the output has weakened from a prior value of + or ++. The methodology for calculating model outputs, and how the various pieces fit together to form the big picture, is explained here. Within government bonds, we take German Bunds into account for Europe.
Cross asset class preferences
This table combines top-down views with bottom-up analysis at the portfolio level.
Most preferred | Least preferred | |
---|---|---|
Convertible bonds |
|
|
Global IG Corporates |
|
|
Global Corporates |
|
|
Global High Yield |
|
|
Emerging Market Corporates - Defensive |
|
|
Emerging Market Corporates - Dynamic / Opportunistic |
|
|
Note: Preferred sectors/regions may differ between asset classes owing to respective performance drivers. In particular, equity exposure is the key performance driver for convertible bonds and is not relevant for corporate bonds.
On the radar: Power struggle between the Fed and Treasury
A historically unprecedented contest over US monetary policy is under way. The US Treasury is issuing vast amounts of short-dated T-bills to finance surging public debt while simultaneously seeking to protect the long end of the yield curve. In addition, it is actively purchasing long-dated Treasuries financed with T-bill proceeds — a strategy reminiscent of „Operation Twist”. These actions are highly liquidity-expansive and fall squarely within the Fed’s traditional remit. At the same time, the Fed is pushing back — reducing liquidity via QT and lower US bank reserves. Its recent rate cut is largely irrelevant in this context, as direct liquidity control is far more potent than rate adjustments.
This confrontation is risky: its market implications are difficult to gauge and could erode confidence in public institutions. Nevertheless, some conclusions can be drawn. Treasury-generated liquidity is flowing into the real economy, while Fed liquidity withdrawal is tightening conditions in equity markets. This divergence is risky for equities in the short-term but supportive of US growth. The chart illustrates the divergence between falling Fed liquidity and still-rising equity markets. Meanwhile, the US GDPNow estimate for Q3 has risen to 3.9%, confirming strong cyclical momentum.
US equities therefore face the risk of a technical correction amid elevated valuations. However, should volatility rise excessively, the Fed is expected to intervene swiftly — reversing liquidity withdrawal into fresh injections.
Chart: Fed liquidity is shrinking

Disclaimer
This presentation (“Presentation”) is provided solely for information purposes and is intended for institutional investors only. Non-institutional investors who obtain this documentation are please asked to discard it or return it to the sender. This Presentation is not a prospectus or an offer or invitation to buy financial products. This Presentation is provided for marketing reasons and is not to be seen as investment research. This Presentation is not prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, and that it is not subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE IS NO GUARANTEE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE Investments in financial products are associated with risks. It is possible to lose the entire amount of the invested capital. Insofar as the information contained in this Presentation comes from external sources, Fisch Asset Management AG cannot guarantee that the information is accurate, complete and up to date. Statements concerning future developments and estimates are based on assumptions that may be inaccurate, that could change or that are based on simplified models. Fisch does not know whether its statements concerning future developments will be correct. Fisch may also change its opinion concerning a future development. In such case, Fisch has no obligation to inform anyone about the change in opinion. Fisch expressly states that this Presentation is not intended for private investors and advises institutional investors to first consult financial, legal and tax experts who are familiar with their specific situation and understand the product. This Presentation is especially not intended for US persons (private or institutional) as defined by the FATCA legislation or under SEC regulations. US persons may not invest in any investment funds managed by Fisch, and Fisch is also not permitted to manage mandates from US persons. If Fisch learns that a US person is invested in a product it manages, it will inform the fund management company and, if necessary, other persons and demand that the US person sell the product. Fisch has outsourced the storage and archiving of company data to a specialized third party firm. The outsourcing is limited to the storage and archiving of data and occurs abroad. The processing of data is done within Fisch and is not outsourced. The activity of the third party firm essentially consists of setting up and maintaining the corresponding servers. The regulatory authorities and the auditing firm have been informed by Fisch about the outsourcing, and the data protection and regulatory requirements are fulfilled. Fisch accepts no liability for damages arising directly or indirectly as a result of this Presentation.